It would be easy to think that when comparing the cost of Toyota’s Camry Hybrid with Tesla’s Model 3 – if one were inclined to make such an odd comparison – the much cheaper Camry would come out on top in the ownership stakes.
However, a number of stories in recent months have highlighted key factors that show the Model 3 – now available for just under $60,000 – can be the more cost-effective purchase if the vehicles are sold after five years with an average of 20,000 kilometres added to the odometer each year.
In a recent video published by YouTuber ‘Tesla Tom’ (a Tesla fan and owner who holds the Camry Hybrid in high regard), this exact argument is made.
Along with the above details, some assumptions need to be made, including an average price of $1.50 per litre of petrol for the Camry, with a 5.0L/100km fuel consumption figure. (Officially, the Camry Ascent Hybrid claims 4.2L/100km, and a real-world figure would likely be higher.)
A depreciation of 40 per cent over five years is also assumed (although the overall Camry range has shown higher rates in recent times).
Likewise, assumptions for the Model 3 (this time based on his experience) include a 16kWh/100km efficiency rate with around 1kWh per day of “phantom loss”, along with 90 per cent of its charging carried out at home with a price of 6.6 cents per kWh. The remaining 10 per cent is given to Tesla Supercharging locations, at 52 cents per kWh.
A five-year depreciation rate of 20 per cent is given for the Model 3 – although this number is based on US data, as nobody in Australia has owned a Model 3 for so long just yet.
These numbers are all explained more specifically in the video, along with servicing/parts costs and the incentives available for EVs, but – without spoiling the verdict – the screengrab below shows a breakdown of the anticipated costs.
How does it turn out? Hit play on the video above!
COMMENTS