Reviews
Gallery48
JUMP AHEAD
- Update 1: Hot on its trail
- Update 2: Urban legend
- Update 3: Mover, not a shaker
- Update 4: Ice makes way for, erm, ICE with electricity
Welcome
- Variant: Nissan X-Trail Ti petrol
- Price as tested: $49,990 drive-away
- This month: 412km @ 9.9L/100km
- Total: As above
48
Hot on its trail
Megatest winner arrives to prove its talents in the real world
Nissan’s X-Trail is a bit like Madonna. Every few years it pops up out of nowhere looking and sounding completely different.
The first car was a boxy homage to the off-roader in soft-ish roader form and looked quite distinctive if a bit like it was teetering on very high heels. The second-gen resolved a lot of the styling ideas and looked pretty good.
The third was even more conservative, acting as twin to the equally buttoned-up Renault Koleos.
What distinguished the X-Trail from early on was a variety of engines and transmissions to keep everyone happy.
That third-gen car soldiered on for a little longer than we were perhaps expecting, longer still when you consider its now-twin, the Mitsubishi Outlander, arrived last year. Both cars have grown in every direction and they look it, although the Nissan less so.
What this new car brings is a lot of new tech that we’ll explore over the next few months.
48
To give you an idea of what your money gets you, there’s the larger 12.3-inch touchscreen, and cameras all over the place to help guide the larger machine through car parks and narrow driveways.
The digital dash with very familiar graphics (familiar if you’ve driven an Outlander) is present, too. You also get a generous 10.8-inch head-up display that I’ve immediately taken to, partly because I find the dash itself a bit busy-looking.
Nissan’s Pro-Pilot provides a pretty clever set of features that make both city and freeway driving less tiresome, with a cruise control that will slow the car to a stop and with a flick of the Resume switch get it going again when the car in front moves. I know that’s not new, but it does a lot more besides as we’ll explore.
48
You also get matrix LED headlights, which is pretty good going for a car under $50K , with the rest of the external lighting also being LED.
The big screen hosts Android Auto via USB and Apple CarPlay wirelessly and you get a wireless charging pad into the bargain. You’ll survey the new interior – light-filled if you’ve opened the sunroof – from part-leather seats and grip a leather-clad steering that feels remarkably like Nappa although Nissan doesn’t say it is.
While it’s all change inside and out – and in a lot of areas underneath – the engine and transmission could best be described as improved rather than new. Nissan’s 2.5-litre naturally aspirated four drives all four wheels (in the Ti and Ti-L) through a slightly better calibrated continuously variable transmission (CVT), a transmission type I used to despise with all of my heart.
48
Either I’ve gone soft (possible) or they’ve got better (also possible) or both (again…), it’s not as objectionable as I remember but I have noticed some light droning.
Power and torque are both up, by 9kW and 18Nm respectively. The car itself – rolling on a new, stiffer CMF-C platform with lots of aluminium panels to save weight – is nearly 100kg heavier but it is packed with a lot more gear.
My first impression of the new X-Trail is that it’s a much more accomplished design than any of its predecessors. There’s nothing awkward about it but nor is it boring. No, it won’t go down as a design classic, but it’s sleek and classy for such a big unit.
48
And it is big. Insisting it fits in the mid-size SUV segment alongside the CX-5 is a big ask, but here we are at nearly 4.7 metres long, straying very close to the next size up.
That means lots of interior space, which I hope to test with people and things. In fact, I’m sure it will be tested given my proximity to the airport and my wife’s penchant for furniture and hardware purchases.
Also top of my list is the way it drives and rides. Again, first impressions are promising. I recently rode in a third-generation X-Trail as a rear passenger and it was not a lot of fun, so with the new platform and a thoroughly reworked suspension set-up, I’m expecting a big improvement.
48
Driving around the suburbs so far has been a very comfortable experience.
Fuel economy so far is reasonable, too, given it hasn’t stretched its legs yet. At 9.9L/100km, it squeaks under the double-digit mark and isn’t too far off the official 7.1L/100km figure on the sticker.
Next month it will have had its legs stretched a bit and the dog will have had her say.
Urban legend
- Variant: Nissan X-Trail Ti petrol
- Price as tested: $49,990 drive-away
- This month: 478km @ 7.8L/100km
- Total: 890km @ 8.7/100km
One of the things that really surprised me about the first month with the X-Trail was its unflappability.
It’s not as though past versions have been particularly flappable; that would be perhaps be a little unfair. But this one is a heftier machine with a road presence you feel from the driver’s seat.
It’s larger and heavier than the previous model, an SUV I drove many times over its years on sale. But this new one feels even more composed and somehow grippier, which feels vaguely odd to note given that an all-wheel-drive X-Trail has usually been very good both on- and off-road.
48
The gains for the X-Trail are significant but not as wildly improved as the three-diamond equivalent
I think the real change is the weight of the controls. The feel through the steering wheel is more substantial than past versions, and it’s quite interesting how my memory keeps blurting out how much better the new car feels as a whole.
It steers well, rides much better and generally gives a greater impression of solidity.
We got a preview of this in the X-Trail’s twin, the Mitsubishi Outlander, a car so much better than the one it replaces it’s scarcely believable it came from the same manufacturer. The gains for the X-Trail are significant but not as wildly improved as the three-diamond equivalent.
48
Another reason it feels so much better is the technology deployed in the car.
The screen is big and welcoming, the wireless Apple CarPlay has rarely faltered. Most CarPlay systems are completely flummoxed by just one phone let alone two that sometimes turn up at the same time.
Doesn’t sound like a big deal but what’s really annoying is when one person is in the house on the phone and the other person goes and gets in the car, the person on the phone loses audio and it ends up in the car. The X-Trail doesn’t do that.
48
The safety systems are well calibrated too. We’ve had a few run-ins with safety systems the past few months but the X-Trail’s have been fairly reliable.
Nissan’s attention to the various systems has meant very few expletive-laden rants about inaccurate speed limits or a lane-centring system that would really rather you were over there rather than going where you want to go.
Although one day in heavy rain it did shut down the forward AEB but unlike some older Subarus, made enough of a point of it so you knew it had happened. Not much you can do about it, of course.
48
One feature that has us both unconvinced is the camera rear-vision mirror.
Pioneered in Jaguar Land Rover products, it still hasn’t won over either my wife or me. There’s something oddly unsettling about looking at the rear-vision mirror and expecting a couple of headrests and the outline of the rear window but seeing none of those things.
Obviously 25 years of driving has formed expectations that I can’t quite shake. It’s genuinely unsettling which is a great shame because it’s otherwise very useful. It just feels a bit weird.
One of our regular test routes with a car is the long highway run from our place in the Sydney suburbs up the Blue Mountains to Katoomba and Medlow Bath.
48
I wasn’t expecting fireworks on the run up the mountains and the X-Trail didn’t deliver them. I was, however, pleased at how well the CVT handled the gradient.
Some CVTs I’ve driven aren’t very good up hills, spinning the engine up to peak power as though at any moment you’re going to need to overtake a road train somewhere around Wentworth Falls but it’s going to rev that engine from Penrith onwards.
My view is that CVTs work best in torque-limited applications and the 2.5-litre four, while hardly anaemic, is not exactly rippling with muscle either.
It cheerfully hauled us up the hills without histrionics, although there were just two of us on board.
48
I don’t think a fully loaded X-Trail would be quite so calm, but if my observations of general traffic are correct, few cars are fully loaded outside of school holidays anyway.
That long run also saw the fuel consumption dip to 6.0L/100km, bringing our overall average down to 8.7L/100km where it has stayed despite most of our driving being short suburban trips.
The dog has also taken to the X-Trail, appreciating the well-designed armrest that allows her plenty of paw space while sticking her head out the window. We appreciate it too because the ridiculous animal gets car-sick if she’s not most of the way out of the car for the majority of the trip.
Mover, not a shaker
- Variant: Nissan X-Trail Ti petrol
- Price as tested: $49,990 drive away
- This month: 1211km @ 9.2L/100km
- Overall: 2101km @ 9.0L/100km
This month was a lot more serious in the X-Trail. We did longer trips. We bought stuff that had to go in the boot. Trips to airports were made. People were moved. It was an altogether more typically suburban life than the big Nissan has had thus far.
Some people will pull me up and say that, actually, it isn’t big. But it is big. While the X-Trail occupies the same segment as the Mazda CX-5, they are from different planets. Five adults is a reasonably agreeable proposition in the Nissan whereas the CX-5 would require a level of financial compensation and physical therapy to convince the middle-seater to join in the fun.
I wouldn’t call it a jolly experience in the X-Trail, but it’s bearable for short trips. It really feels a size larger than its Mazda and Toyota compatriots and has the legroom of the pricier Tiguan.
48
I reckon it would give the Tiguan Allspace a run for its money too. I maintain the VW is the better drive in 162 TSI form but it’s significantly more expensive than the Nissan.
Having said all of that, the people moving portion of this month involved the shuttling of international visitors. It was a cold day in hell (Sydney) that greeted them as I whisked them between appointments. Well, whisked might be slightly overdoing it as the X-Trail is still sluggish if faultlessly smooth owing to its relatively modest outputs and tuned-for-comfort CVT.
The passengers remarked upon the roominess in the back, finding it almost luxurious. They also complimented the ride without prompting, saying it was smooth and quiet. It handled the inner west and CBD sections with aplomb.
48
I also found it pretty relaxing in the city despite its size, the light and accurate steering as competent and kind to my inputs as it has always been. So that went well.
Another, more judgemental passenger, was our idiot dog, regularly seen in these pages as the better looking creature in the photos. Indy suffers from car sickness, a malady so maddening for someone in this job I nearly wept on our first trip with her up to the Blue Mountains.
The ridiculous animal staggered from a RAV4 and brought up everything it had eaten in the last week or so before looking accusingly at me. After some time we worked out it was a dastardly combination of anxiety and motion sickness.
48
The X-Trail is one of those handy machines that allows you to adjust the position of the rear seat. Split as it is 60/40, you can move either or both sections right up to where the front seats are.
This allowed the spoilt brat to stay in her car bed but also pop her paws up on the centre console and breathe heavily on my elbow for our mission to Jervis Bay to supply our son with a birthday cake. Both dog and cake survived without any untoward splatterings or upsets. She seemed a lot happier with this arrangement and given she didn’t puke, so did I.
This 400km round trip also reinforced how frugal the X-Trail is on long journeys. Stretch its legs and it will use fuel in the high fives or low sixes for the freeway section, which is mightily impressive for such a big unit. What it loses out in power and performance it absolutely gains in efficiency.
48
While that might sound obvious, it’s difficult to achieve those numbers with such a large amount of metal pushing its way through the air at speed.
Its final challenge in this frantic third month was a trip to Bunnings. After a slow first half of the year for my wife’s ambitious DIY program – nearly dying on the floor of an emergency department tends to slow one down for a little while – she suddenly found that she needed both a trip to Bunnings and several nurseries to get things back on track.
As expected, the X-Trail swallowed an improbably large bag of soil, several plants, some large plant holder things (guess who isn’t the handy person in the house) and various gardening accessories and it all found its way home in a single trip.
48
The boot of the X-Trail is voluminous, starting at 585 litres (bested only by the Tiguan) and nearly tripling to around 1600 litres with the seats down.
And so the time has come to set it free and return it to its maker. We loved the X-Trail’s time with us – a low-stress, easy companion that can do just about anything. Luckily, we’re getting another, this time the E-Power hybrid version. See you next month.
ICE makes way for, erm, ICE with electricity
- Variant: Nissan X-Trail e-Power Ti petrol
- Price as tested: $54,690 drive away
- This month: 621km @ 8.2L/100km
- Total: As above
There was some confusion upon this car’s arrival. I mean, we knew it was coming and we knew it was different, but having spent three months in the Ti-L and waxing lyrical about how comfortable and well-equipped it was, we thought perhaps that the Ti would be slumming it.
Far from it. There is so little difference between the two I can’t really understand the appeal of the Ti-L when compared to the Ti, but hey, people do like a sunroof and a particularly nice version of leather. That’s basically it, so anyone sitting on the fence should be across why the Ti-L costs more.
Colour aside, the big change between these two cars is the drivetrain. Where the Ti-L had a fairly adequate 2.5-litre/CVT/all-wheel drive setup, the Ti had the e-Power e-4orce (Nissan’s idea, not mine).
48
To all intents and purposes this is a hybrid, but not as we know it.
Where most hybrids have an electric motor somewhere between engine and gearbox, Nissan has changed the order and not provided a physical connection to the wheels or even a gearbox.
The 1.5-litre has a variable compression setup which is meant to save fuel and behave more efficiently as a generator but it also makes what can only be described as a long continuous farting sound when it’s cold.
48
The three-cylinder turbo – quite honestly one of my favourite engine configurations of all time – spins up 106kW to feed a 2.1kWh battery and an inverter that runs a 150kW motor at the front and a 100kW motor at the rear. So you get the EV experience just with your own onboard generator.
Practically this means you’ve got approximately 1000km of range without having to find a charger because the battery is so small – compared to the Mitsubishi’s approach on the same platform with a 20kWh battery and a plug – there’s no point to having a plug.
It also means the X-Trail is rather more spritely off the mark than the 2.5. The electric motors just go and it has a pretty reasonable turn of speed off the lights if being a little light on for overtaking on motorways and highways. It’s still better than the 2.5, though.
48
Both of us noticed that the steering wasn’t as good as the petrol. This seems to a be an affliction we found in common with the new Honda ZR-V hybrid (comparison here) and I guess the steering is tuned to try and hide the extra weight, all 230kgs of it.
The body is also a little less well tied-down in corners and, oddly, you notice the effect of big wheels more than the petrol.
We’ve got the car for two more months, so we’ll see if our initial impressions smooth out a bit.
MOREMidsize SUVs
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
COMMENTS